If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

B, on June 201, 201, the first police officer, proposed the Defendant to sell the passbook to the person who was already aware of the Internet search, and the Defendant also consented thereto.

B On June 201, 201, on condition of receiving KRW 3.50,00 won per one bankbook, a national bank account in the name of the accused from the accused, a bank account in the name of the accused, a bank account in the name of the accused, a bank account in the name of the accused (Account Number: D), a community credit cooperative account (Account Number: E) and a cash card, a security card, and a password of each of the above passbooks were delivered by using the old bus account in the front line.

As such, the Defendants conspired to transfer the means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. A deposit certificate;

1. Each certificate of transfer;

1. Results of transfer management;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written confirmation of transfer results;

1. Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.