A. 1) The non-party B (hereinafter referred to as the "the defendant's driver") was the beneficiary of the defendant driving a light transport taxi (hereinafter referred to as "the vehicle of this case"), and around 01:40 on July 11, 2010, the non-party B (hereinafter referred to as the "the defendant's driver") was responsible for driving the vehicle of this case using the first line in the direction of the junch tunnel in the direction of the junch road, the second line in front of the Ecafeteria (5 lanes, including the fourth line, the safety zone) in front of the Ecafeteria at the front city of the front city. The plaintiff was responsible for driving the vehicle of this case using the second line in the direction of the junch tunnel, the second line in front of the EM (5 lanes, the second line in front of the vehicle of this case), and it was difficult to take care of the safe driving of the vehicle of this case. However, the plaintiff's driver of this case was not found to have driven the road to the right side side of the vehicle of this case, and caused the plaintiff's brain th.

B. The limitation of liability is limited, however, in a dangerous situation where the Plaintiff is under the influence of alcohol (ful dunken, evidence No. B No. 4) and the surrounding area cannot be properly considered due to the late night hours, the Plaintiff was placed in the safety zone of the second line (5th line if the crosswalk was included in the 4th line, the safety zone) and the road without permission (the crosswalk was located near about 50 meters from the point at which the instant accident occurred). The Defendant’s liability is limited to 60% in calculating the amount of damages that the Defendant would compensate for.

[Evidence] Part of the dispute.