beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.04.13 2017고단5783

농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin.

On November 11, 2014, the Defendant recruited franchise stores after filing a report on franchise franchise business with the name of “B”. From November 13, 2014 to December 5, 2016, the Defendant introduced the amount of KRW 384,676,00 of the land at the boundary of the headquarters located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, as “one-way one-way one-way one,” and supplied the same to each franchise store by introducing the amount of KRW 384,67,00 of the land at the boundary of the headquarters located in Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, as “one-way one-way one-way one,” and provided the Defendant with an indication of the new-party one-way one-way two-way one-way two-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way two-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one.

However, the Defendant’s bear and supply of the gent head sugar and the girratory bridge that the Defendant manufactured and supplied to the franchise store as above was manufactured and processed by mixing the head of the domestic girs with the head of Australia and the United States girs, girs, girs, and so on (8% of the head of the domestic girs (domestic), 30% of the girs ( Australia or the United States girs), 2% of the girs ( Australia or the United States girs), and 60% of the girs). Nevertheless, the Defendant manufactured and supplied the girral girs and the girral girs mixed with the domestic girs and Australia or the United States girs. As above, the Defendant indicated that it would cause confusion with the indication of origin as if only the domestic girs were used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A criminal report (specific quantity of violation quantity based on objective data);

1. A seizure list;

1. Data to close the Internet B B, such as the business license, the current status of the franchise store, item manufacturing report and output, the specifications of the purchase and transaction of raw materials, the franchise store merz, etc. (in the name of Jinju, Dosan, Gu US, Matern, Matern, Sejong), the location of G church, and the name of B head office, etc.;