[2015 Highest 3249] The Defendant was living in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C from July 2012 to March 2015, 2015, and came to be hedging.

1. On July 13, 2014, around 00:00, the injured Defendant: (a) placed in front of the front door of the new elementary school No. 77-gil 1, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in order for the victim to drinking alcohol with other females; (b) made it difficult for the victim to take the victim’s face, arms, legs, etc. into drinking.

2. On April 10, 2015, at around 00:30 on April 10, 2015, the Defendant intruded into the first floor of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D apartment with a password by an influence, and then intruded into the residence of the victim C and his/her dependent E with the victim’s 401.

3. On May 8, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 20:30 on May 8, 2015, the Defendant entered the G restaurant operated by the victim C, which is located in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by entering the restaurant despite that the victim’s access to the restaurant is prohibited; (b) stating that “this wol, n, is the same as performing funeral services here; and (c) smoking a cigarette with a seat of 30 minutes; and (d) allowing the customer who was going to the said restaurant to return to the said restaurant.

[2015 Highest 4425]

1. On April 4, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 21:00, at the G cafeteria operated by the victim C (Y, 52 years of age), in Seo-gu Incheon, the Defendant sent to customers a disturbance at around 1 hour, such as: (b) the Defendant: (c) coming from the G cafeteria operated by the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F; (d) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant saw one-person among the customers as to whether he would go against the disturbance; and (d) the Defendant her drinking H on a drinking-line; and (e) the Defendant her flicked the disturbance for about 1 hour, such as having the customers go against the disturbance at around 52 hours.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On January 2015