According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance and asserted only unfair sentencing on the grounds of appeal.

In such a case, the assertion that there was an error of infringement of the defendant’s right of defense, such as the right to receive assistance in criminal judicial proceedings, in violation of Article 26 of the Act on Prohibition of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities and Remedies for Rights, Etc. (hereinafter “Act on Prohibition of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities”) in the course of the prosecution of this case and the trial of the first instance, and that there was an error of misunderstanding of the legal principles,

In addition, the ground of appeal that the court below erred by infringing on the defendant's right to defense, such as the right to receive assistance in criminal judicial proceedings against Article 26 of the Act on the Prohibition of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities in the course of the trial of the court below, cannot be accepted in light of the progress

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.