The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Defendant

A는 2016. 7. 30. 22:50경 서울시 동작구 C 지하1층 ‘D’ 유흥주점에서, 피고인들이 주점영업을 방해하고 있다는 112신고를 받고 정복차림으로 출동한 서울동작경찰서 E지구대 소속 경위 F, 순경 G로부터 술값 지급 및 귀가를 권유받았다는 이유로 F을 때릴 듯이 주먹을 꽉 쥐고 바라보면서 “야! 이 씨발놈아! 뭔데! 왜 뭐가 잘못됐는데 이 씨발!!”이라고 욕설하고, 업무방해로 현행범인 체포한다는 고지를 듣자 손으로 F의 몸을 밀치고 출입문을 발로 차고, 옆에 있던 피고인 B은 F이 피고인 A를 체포하지 못하도록 손으로 F의 손가락을 잡아 꺾고 F의 뒤에서 F의 뒷목을 누르는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A H statement;

1. On-site reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. The Defendants: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act consisting of the defendants' mistakes and reflects them; (b) the defendants appear to have caused them to commit the instant crime in an interesting situation due to the drinking-price problem; (c) the defendants A had no criminal power; and (d) the defendants B had no power to commit any other crime than the punishment imposed by a fine of KRW 300,000 prior to 20 years; and (e) other circumstances, such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case are considered.