A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of suspension of execution of the same kind of crime even though he had a previous conviction in several times, strict punishment against the defendant is needed.

However, considering the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too heavy or too harsh, and thus, the above argument by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is without merit. The above argument by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.