However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 19, 2016, around 03:30 on February 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the office of “C” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) in the course of the victim D (58 years of age) and Sinbbing, the victim’s breath was slicking with breath; and (c) in the course of the victim D (58 years of age) and Sinbbing, the Defendant dumpeded the victim’s face and b

2. At around 00:55 on March 11, 2016, the Defendant entering a residence: (a) in the victim F’s residence in Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gun, the Defendant divided the first race of the said residence into several times to meet the victim; (b) but the victim does not open the door; (c) opened the entrance door of the said residence; (d) opened an unreshing door of the said residence; and (e) intruded the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of on-site photographs, CCTV photographs, requests for investigation cooperation, and examination and treatment set-off statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 257(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act and choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act provides that many criminal records of the same kind of crime are treated as disadvantageous circumstances