However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Suppression;

A. At around 01:50 on February 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, “E” (hereinafter “E”), a victim D (hereinafter “V”) located under C underground (hereinafter “V”), who was operated by a general restaurant business license, allowed female employees to sit in a public restaurant business license, drink 100,000 won, and then requested the victim to pay the drinking value; (b) the State where the general restaurant business license was granted, using the fact that the victim cannot make the employee sit in a public restaurant; and (c) made the victim’s request to pay the drinking value; and (d) made the victim’s request to pay the drinking value, the State where the general restaurant business license was granted, to the effect that the Defendant would not request the victim to pay the drinking value by reporting to the police.”

As such, the Defendant got the victim to have frighten a claim of 100,000 won of the drinking value, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. On May 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 2014, the victim G (V, 39 years of age) located in F at the Jeju-si with a general restaurant business license; (b) H “H”, which enables female employees to sit in the bar and provide other alcohol equivalent to 200,000 won; and (c) requested the victim to pay the drinking value.

In the same way as the statement in the port, the victim was frighted to prevent the victim from claiming the drinking value.

As such, the Defendant got the victim to have frightened to claim 200,000 won of the drinking value, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

C. On April 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00 on April 22, 2014, the victim J (W, 57 years of age) located in Jeju Island, operated by the Defendant with a general restaurant business license; (b) KK’s dan, which allowed female employees to sit in a bar; and (c) demanded the Defendant to pay the drinking value by the victim; and (d) the Defendant requested the victim to pay the drinking value.

In the same way as the statement in the port, the victim was frighted to prevent the victim from claiming the drinking value.

The Defendant, as such, frightened the victim and frightened the victim with the alcohol value of 300,000 won.