Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

In doing so, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles as to self-defense or legitimate act, and the burden of proof under the Criminal Procedure Act.

And according to the records, there is no error in the prosecution's investigation process and the trial procedure of the court below as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is permitted only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is sentenced. Thus, the argument that the sentencing of a sentence is unfair is not legitimate grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.