If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person driving a CM7 car.

On January 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:40, and sent it to the view of the National Land Research Institute of Korea, from the 3-lane of the straight distance of the apartment road in front of the straight distance in front of the straight distance in front of the straight distance in the front of the right-hand road in the front of the front of the right-hand road in the front of the front of the front of the front of the road in the front of the front of the entrance.

At the same time, the taxi vehicles for the victim D(58) Estststy operation of the victim D(58) driving in the front line were in the signal atmosphere, and the defendant got to yield to the right side of the Samsung Apartment apartment, but the victim did not yield to the right side of the Samsung apartment, and the victim was driving along the three-lane distance from the long distance side of the Duna to the long distance of the National Land Research Institute in order to threaten the victim on the ground that it was bad for the victim to not yield to the right side of the Samsung apartment, and then the damaged vehicle was pushed down to the right side of the 3-lane.

As a result, the Defendant threatened the victim by using a vehicle that is a dangerous object, such as causing the risk of traffic accidents and causing the victim to feel fear.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention of the workhouses is that the criminal liability is not minor in light of the background and content of the instant crime.

However, it is decided as per the disposition in full view of the fact that the defendant's mistake is against the victim, that the victim is the preference against the defendant due to the agreement with the victim, and all other sentencing conditions including the defendant's age, environment, etc.