beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.10 2014나8171

대여금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The court's reasoning for this case is as follows: "B 18" in Part 2 of Part 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "B 14"; "C apartment" in Part 13 is as "J apartment"; "C apartment" in Part 3 is as "J apartment"; "A collective loan guarantee obligation of this case" (hereinafter "collective loan guarantee obligation of this case") is as "(hereinafter "the "collective loan of this case")"; "B 14" in the Part 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "joint consolidation"; "B 15" in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "joint consolidation"; "The date of debt-equity swap of this case becomes effective" in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant's debt-equity swap of this case becomes effective as of the date of debt-equity swap of this case and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance which cites the defendant's partial satisfaction of payment of the defendant's debt of this case."

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.