사기미수등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 1, 2011, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud: (a) drafted a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement for consumption of money (No. 703 of document 2011) with the victim C, providing the victim C with a loan of KRW 20,000,000 in terms of the purchase cost of the EM in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) the G law firm located in Seongbuk-gu F in Changsi-si, Changsi-si, Changsi-si, with the victim and the victim “30,000,000 won in rent, and January 1, 2012.”
Since then, the Defendant received 13,300,000 won from the victim from September 14, 201 to March 19, 2012, from the victim for the actual loan of KRW 20,000,000 to the victim, and received KRW 5,000,000 on January 12, 2012 and KRW 2,00,000 on January 20, 2012, and the victim received full payment by paying the Defendant’s insurance premium on behalf of the Defendant until June 2015, and part of the loan credits of KRW 30,00,000 on the said Notarial Deed was not accrued at the beginning, and the remainder was extinguished by the victim’s repayment.
Although all of the loan claims on the above notarial deed have been extinguished, the Defendant, on March 3, 2016, filed an application for auction of the claim amounting to KRW 66,098,630 on the basis of the above notarial deed with the Changwon District Court’s Masan branch and the land located in Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and sought to deceive the above court and obtain a decision of commencing compulsory execution by deceiving the above court. However, on August 19, 2016, the Defendant won in the lawsuit of objection raised by the victim against the Defendant, and appears to be a clerical error as of September 6, 2016, while the indictment was written on September 5, 2016.
The defendant's withdrawal of compulsory execution did not bring about an attempted crime.
2. When the victim C(50 years of age) filed a lawsuit of objection against the Defendant on the grounds of the circumstances described in paragraph (1) of March 15, 2016, the Defendant of intimidation, who used a cellular phone around March 27, 2016, must not “ort this test,” and the Defendant should not only have “ort it,” the victim’s comments using the cell phone around March 27, 2016.
The route to which raw water will become raw is drawn.