물품대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Part 3, "Evidence 2 through 7 of the A" shall be written with "Evidence 2 through 7, 21 of the A".
No. 1, 2, 13 through 16 shall be added to "B No. 1, 2, 13 through 16" in Section 6 of the Chapter 4.
At the bottom of Part 7, the same entry as the following part shall be added to the fourth part:
A person shall be appointed.
C. The Defendant’s assertion 1 on the claim for mutual aid related to Changwon and Seosan Road Construction, based on the following circumstances, asserts that the Defendant should deduct the amount of losses related to the Namwon and Seosan Road Construction from the price of the material for Changwon and Seosan Road Construction. ① The Defendant agreed between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff that the construction income should be paid from the Plaintiff when the Defendant relayed the conclusion of the Plaintiff’s construction contract. Although the Defendant made an oral agreement with the Plaintiff to contract the Plaintiff for the construction work in the Southern Seomun District in an amount equivalent to KRW 60 million, the Defendant concluded a contract with the Plaintiff for the construction works in the Southern Seomun District, notwithstanding the said agreement, the Plaintiff did not receive more than KRW 352,00,00,000 for the construction cost and the construction cost. Accordingly, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the said amount to be deducted from the price of the material for Changwon and Seosan Road Construction that the Defendant would have to pay the said amount to the Plaintiff.
each of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 8, 9 of No. 2.