When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was a person who escaped from May 2008 and entered Korea in the year 2009, and B was known as a person who entered Korea on August 12, 2012, and entered Korea on January 3, 2014, and was living together with each other, and who works outside the North Korean hub (person who escaped from North Korea).

On November 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim C, who is a North Korean citizen, by telephone call, to take care of the mother in whom both robbery is dissolved; and (b) made a false statement to the effect that “the mother in North Korea may take care of the mother in North Korea.” (c) At least one year, the Defendant took care of one year, and first made a false statement to the effect that 2 million won is attached to the retainer.”

However, even after receiving the above money, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to take South Korea with the mother of the victim in North Korea.

The Defendant received KRW 2 million from the victim to the Korean bank account (D) in Korea.

On August 8, 2018, B continued to have telephone conversationsd around August 8, 2018, "at present, there is no money now in China, and no mobile phone fee is available. It is difficult to use this phone on the north side and China side, so it is necessary to pay more than one million won, and it is issued one million won from the victim to the Korean bank account (D) of B.

As a result, the Defendant was jointly issued KRW 3 million from the victim two times in conjunction with the victim B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of deposit transactions, such as a report on investigation into the complaint (the details of the victim's submission of Kax and text attached), a statement of deposit transactions, entry and departure records (A, B), Kax dialogue, etc.

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act that applies to the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;