Of the facts charged in the instant case.

【Relationship between the Defendant and the Victim】 The Defendant was a U.S. citizen, and the Victim E came to know through the introduction of F, which is the victim’s seat, in the U.S. around May 2003, the Defendant came to know of the Victim E, and had a sense of care for the victim, and had a telephone call to the victim in Korea since then, and the victim got to have a good relationship with her husband on December 2005, which led to the rapid gap between her husband and her husband, which led to the development of a relationship.

Since then, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea on February 17, 2006 and stayed, and around that time the Defendant took photographs and videos of the victim’s body and sexual intercourses with the victim from H hotel located in Seoul G, Chuncheon Ma on two occasions.

Since then, around March 2006, the defendant was wraped by the fact that the victim and the above video were stored in the Nowon-gu of the defendant, and the victim tried to hedging against the defendant.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Habitual intimidation;

A. A. Around March 2006, the Defendant, at H hotel located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, made a call to the victim-friendly job offer I who did not receive a telephone, and threatened the victim that “I would spread a sexually related video if the victim did not receive a telephone within the E or not make a telephone to B.”

B. Around June 2006, the Defendant called H hotel in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government or the U.S. Burania to the “J Council member” located in Chuncheon that the victim works with her husband while serving as the head of office, and threatened K of the assistant nurse with “the head of office video so that he/she may send gifts to him/her, if he/she becomes aware of the call.”

C. On March 1, 2006, the Defendant called the victim at a place in which a police officer was not a police officer, and notified the husband of the contact when he was aware of the contact within the hospital, and would spread the sexually related video to the hospital.

‘B' is a threat, and on May 2006, the victim called 'B' is called 'B' against the victim who refuses to meet with the defendant.