beta
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.10.13 2015가단17483

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants: 1,00,000 won for each of the designated parties to the Plaintiff (designated parties); 3,000,000 won for the designated parties H; and 1,000 won for the designated parties I.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Appointed H, Defendant B, and E were students of K High School in the Asia-siJ at the time of 2010, and Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Appointed Party I are the parents of SH, Defendant C, and D are the parents of Defendant B, and Defendant F, and Defendant E are the parents of Defendant E.

B. Around May 2010, Defendant B and Non-Party N assaulted Defendant B and Non-Party N in MPC L in Asan City, and the Selection filed a complaint with the Asan Police Station on August 30, 2010 for assaulting Defendant B and N.

C. Accordingly, Defendant B, at around September 2010, had the option to file a complaint for defamation of Selection H with a view to manipulating the reasons for assaulting Selection H, and around September 2010, Defendant B, using a computer, prepared a false complaint with the Appointer H, stating that “I will not take the desire of the Appointer H,” and submitted it to the public service center of the Busan Police Station on September 20, 2010, and submitted it to the assistantO on October 4, 2010 as a witness of the case of defamation of the Appointer H, and after receiving a supplementary investigation from the assistantO on October 4, 2010, H “I and I will see that I will “I will see that I will see that I will am and I will see that I will am and I would like to see that I will see that I will see their reputation.”

On the other hand, Defendant E appeared as a witness of the above defamation case against Selection on January 11, 201, and testified after being sworn, it was discussed that Defendant E’s room “N was like Q. He saw N as a man-child game. He saw N’s full quality of the son accompanying Nran, and he saw off off the clothes of N. N. B going off. I. am. I.).” Although Defendant E did not have any opinion that “N was a male-child-gu, but she was flick with a male-child,” Defendant E’s appearance was for the purpose of undermining the her mother’s H.