If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No one shall distribute a game product the rating classification of which has been refused because it falls under speculative game products, provide such for use, or display or keep such game product for the purpose of providing for distribution or use.

From May 18, 2013 to May 18, 2013, the Defendant provided two of the MFMRY game software, the rating of which was determined as of June 1, 2012, to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Each letter of self-sufficiency A, E, and F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of investigation reports (Attachment of a certificate of game classification, etc.), internal investigation reports ( photographs of game machine in a cartoon room and evidence evidence submitted voluntarily), investigation reports (game Rating Board game method and game rating verification-related Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 4 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry, the Selection of Fines concerning the relevant criminal facts, and the Selection of Fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;