2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On May 31, 2014, the Defendant changed accommodation from D hotel located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the victim E as if he would pay accommodation expenses.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay accommodation charges even if the victim received accommodation from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being provided with accommodation room from the victim, obtained accommodation charge of KRW 172,00 and incidental expenses of KRW 20,900. The Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits of KRW 192,90 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accommodation details;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;