However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Attached Form

The same shall apply to the facts charged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of prosecution and police concerning B;

1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A copy of each police interrogation protocol regarding C or D;

1. Copy of the police statement of E;

1. On April 15, 200, three copies, including on-site identification reports, documentary evidence records, on-site photographs, the current status of thief products and site photographs, the image and mobile line photographs, clothes screen pictures (B) taken by a thief at the time of committing a F apartment, new photograph such as the suspect's satisfy, investigation reports (related to the specific period for three cases of intrusion of a suspect apartment), photographs related to the crime of F apartment H, scientific investigation team photograph, front photograph of the suspect, investigation report (related to the purchase of stolen goods), photo photographs, etc., investigation reports (C telephone conversationss, transaction specifications, solid purchase records, written agreement, investigation reports (related to the alteration of the number of crimes of thief), user of CCTV-related objects, investigation report, collection and duplication of CCTV-related items, list of video-related articles attached to A, list of video-related articles and CCTV-related articles attached to A, report on the acquisition of the CCTV-related items.

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) cannot be strictly punished, as the value of the stolen goods purchased at salt prices increases twice.

However, the defendant is against the defendant, and the victim does not want to punish the defendant due to the recovery of considerable damage.

In addition, the defendant does not have criminal punishment.