2. Considering that there is no change in circumstances that could consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, even considering the circumstances alleged by the defendant as the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the term "criminal facts" as stated in the first sentence of the judgment of the court below shall be construed as " September 21, 2006", "eight months of imprisonment" as "six months of imprisonment", and "one year and six months of imprisonment" as "one year and six months of imprisonment" in the first sentence of the first sentence, and "after the Incheon District Court's Vice-Support on April 4, 2014, it shall be added to "two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, etc. (a deadly Weapons, etc.)" as "two years of imprisonment with prison labor".