However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 2, 2013, around 21:15, the Defendant entered the “D convenience store in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and committed a theft by inserting 2,600 won of the victim E-owned market price into the main machine, and then putting 2,00 won of the victim E-owned price into the main machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, considering the fact that the accused has been sentenced to a fine five times from the date of 2012 to the theft of the several Acts identical to this case, the Defendant is selected to imprisonment at this time, but the accused is willing to repent and not to repeat again, and the Defendant does not have any criminal record exceeding the fine, and has no substantial damage, etc., a lower sentence than the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines for the sentencing guidelines shall be determined and the execution thereof shall be suspended on the condition of probation.