Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

, however, the defendant.

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant A (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to Defendant B (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unfased and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The crime of this case against Defendant A was committed independently or in collusion with the victim Eul by deceiving the victims as if they were to find employment. The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud on September 17, 2009, and committed each of the crimes of this case under the same several methods without being aware of the repeated crime period even after the execution of the sentence was completed on March 15, 2010. The crime of this case is not good, and the defendant was committed against the victim P. It is acknowledged that the defendant did not agree with the victim P. It was not sufficient to reach up to the present day, but that the defendant committed the crime of this case against his wrong act through detention for more than eight months, and that the defendant agreed in the victim G and investigation stage, the victim H, L and the trial court, the defendant's health is not good, and the defendant's age, environment, personality and behavior, the defendant's age, the circumstances and motive of the crime of this case, and the circumstances that led to the defendant's punishment after considering the following circumstances.

B. Although it is recognized that Defendant B made a confession of criminal facts against Defendant B during the trial, the Defendant was the first offender, and the Defendant appears to have recovered to a certain extent the damage was caused by the agreement with the victim H and L in the trial, it is necessary to recover the damage even though the Defendant, in collusion with A and planned by deceiving the victims to find employment, by deceiving the victims of the total sum of KRW 59 million.