A, B, D, and E shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Defendant E and Defendant D are the members of I Company, Defendant B are the heads of I Company, and Defendant C are the representatives of I Company.

Around March 28, 2012, the said I company entered into a contract for the remodeling project of the Kmomoto room located in the Busan Shipping Daegu High Court (hereinafter referred to as “studio building”) which is owned by Defendant A and Defendant A and entered into a dispute with the payment of construction cost, etc. during the construction project to May 7, 2012.

Accordingly, Defendant C and Defendant B brought the windows and doors of the above studio building on May 19, 2012. Accordingly, Defendant A prevented Defendant C, etc. from entering the said studio building by correcting the entrance door of the said studio building. Defendant C filed a lawsuit against Defendant A on May 22, 2012 for provisional attachment and requesting the payment of the construction cost, and Defendant C had exercised a mutual power by installing a steel fence at the front entrance of the studio on June 6, 2012.

Defendant

C In relation to the act of installing fences, June 6, 2012, the above, on the ground that Defendant A interfered with Defendant A’s management of the studio building, it was prosecuted on August 29, 2012 from the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch branch branch to the crime of interference with business and pending trial.

Criminal facts

1. On July 2012, Defendants E, D, B, and C co-principaled with intent to enter and photograph the studio building that is managed and connected by the victim A using the camping cocos in order to secure materials favorable to them in the above lawsuit for the payment of the construction price at issue.

Defendants came to the studio building on July 4, 2012, 17:52:28, and Defendant D opened an entrance at several entrances and entered the studio building. Defendant E opened the entrance at around 18:01 on the same day, Defendant B around 18:36 on the same day, and Defendant C intruded into the building managed by the victim, respectively, through the door opened by Defendant E at around 20:56 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendants are jointly managed by the victim A.