beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.02.13 2018고단5544

건조물침입등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of intrusion upon residence at the Daegu District Court on February 23, 2018, and completed the execution of the sentence at a detention house on October 24, 2018.

"2018 Highest 5544"

1. On November 22, 2018, at around 03:30, the Defendant entered a building managed by the victim C in the Gyeongdong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, into a large room where the door was not set away due to the absence of the present tenant through the open gate in the place of the building.

2. On November 22, 2018, around 11:08, the Defendant entered into the room described in paragraph 1 where the door was not locked through the open gate on the ground that the urine was urgent.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by the victim more than twice in total.

On October 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 06:55 on October 30, 2018, the fact at the F cafeteria operated by the victim E, which was located in the Gluribuk-gun, did not have a means of settlement under water; and (b) was committed as if the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she orders liquor and food.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided with alcoholic beverages and food equivalent to KRW 12,00,00 in total, including 12,00,000, from the victim’s 1st century, and 12,000 from November 13, 2018, and was provided with alcoholic beverages and food equivalent to KRW 149,00 in total four times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims to acquire financial benefits.

On November 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 18:40 on November 11, 2018, 2018, hereinafter “2018 Highest 6068”), on the part of the office of “H” located in Seongbuk-gun G, the victim I (the age of 66) operated, and acted as if the victim would normally pay for the taxi expenses, and led the victim to drive the taxi to return to the family of the same Gun to the family of the same Gun.

However, the defendant is paid in cash at the time.