손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On January 16, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) was a female with the gymnasium symptoms; (b) was born to the E-won operated by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) due to symptoms where the gymnasium became worse and the gymnasium continued even after the birth.
On January 6, 2016 and April 9, 2016, Defendant C, a mountain father and doctor working at the Defendant Hospital, performed a half-yearly spathm in the Plaintiff, and refinite spathm in the Plaintiff. The size of the spathm x 10.6cm in the size of the spath x 9.7cm in the spath x 9.2cm in the spath, and diagnosed that the spathical spathm in the spath and spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spaths
B. On April 25, 2016, at the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff received from Defendant C an electronic flaging procedure, and flaging surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”). At the time of the surgery, the Plaintiff was seriously flaged with the glag womb, and the wall of the glag and both parts of the glag and the workplace were taken.
The defendant C implemented the e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic, and confirmed whether the e-pathic e-pathic e-pathic e-la
C. On April 27, 2016, the Plaintiff discharged the Defendant Hospital.
After the surgery on May 6, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms that much of left side friends, and the Defendant C recommended again to move back when the symptoms continue to exist.
On May 28, 2016, the Plaintiff received outpatients from the Defendant Hospital. On the last weekend, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms that the right side of the front side of the weekends severely pains, and the Defendant C considered that there is pains as both side glasss, and determined that there is pains, rather than the situation of damage to the crypium, and agreed to observe the progress of the outpatients after four weeks, rather than the situation of damage to the crypium.
On June 25, 2016, the plaintiff was born to the defendant hospital and gave rise to inconvenience to the side.