If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 07:50 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) posted a telephone card at the public telephone boxes owned by the victim KT located in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but did not get a telephone, and destroyed the 1 unit of the above-mentioned fire engine that caused the damage of the market price by putting one unit of the public telephone fire on a telephone line on the ground that the card was not opened without a telephone.

The Defendant of the Seoul Southern District Court of Seoul, on October 26, 2006, was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 31, 2014, and two million won for the same crime at the same court on March 31, 2014.

On June 30, 2014, at around 02:42, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motorcycle, driven a DNA-owned person, under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.129% from the roads near Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the middle point of the Sungsan Bridge bridge located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

As a result, the Defendant once or more times driven a motorcycle with no license under the influence of alcohol, even though he had a history of violating the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol.

On August 2, 2014, from around 06:40 to around 07:10 of the same day, the Defendant ordered H, an employee of the victim F in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to provide food at the “G” restaurant operated by the victim F in Gangseo-gu, Seoul, but interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by following the following: (a) the Defendant ordered h, an employee of the said restaurant; (b) but (c) the defect, stating that “the food is not allowed unless 13,00 won is known to the outside,” and (d) the disturbance, such as a large sturfing, and the tebing, carried a click, which is a click, carried the click; and (b) preventing the entering customers from entering the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 High Court 887"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (pacter telephone investigation, file of field photographs) 2015 high-level 888;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial report on the driver, the status of the driver, and the report on the status of the driver.