청구이의
1. Compulsory execution against the Defendant’s Plaintiff based on the Daejeon District Court Decision 2016Da329492 Decided December 21, 2016.
Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and the overall purport of the arguments and arguments set forth in subparagraphs A through 5, it is recognized that the Plaintiff paid the total amount of KRW 4,323,265 as stated in the Disposition to C (State) delegated by the Defendant with debt collection on April 10, 2019 and paid all the judgment amount. Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant’s compulsory execution based on the Daejeon District Court Decision 2016Da329492 Decided December 21, 2016 against the Plaintiff is denied.
In regard to this, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff was issued a seizure and collection order against the plaintiff, but the expenses incurred therein have not been repaid, and that the debt has not been fully repaid. However, the defendant's assertion should be recovered from the execution expenses to the collection procedure or through the procedure to determine the amount of execution expenses, and it does not include the above judgment payment obligation
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.