부당비행정지구제재심판정취소
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. The total cost of the lawsuit is resulting from the supplementary participation.
1. The grounds for this part of the decision by the court concerning this are as follows, except for the case where a part of the decision by reexamination is written, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 2, No. 8 to No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance) is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part shall be cited pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act
No. 2 of the first instance judgment, "the plaintiff" in the first instance judgment No. 16 shall be added to "the participant".
The first instance judgment of the court of first instance was submitted from 3th to 7th of the same face. The first instance judgment was submitted as follows.
On September 15, 2014, the Intervenor submitted a situation description to D, “A” to the effect that the Korean nationals are unable to grow salt, and that the Korean nationals are allowed to do so. The restriction of naturally is an excessive restriction on the physical freedom. ② The restriction of naturally naturally is an excessive restriction on the freedom of body, ③ it is growing a beard with religious reasons and faith, and it is not growing for any other imprudent purpose. The captain, with pride, promises to be softened that the company can work very strongly, so that it is difficult to control the appearance’s image. The Intervenor submitted a situation description to the effect that it is no more specific and clear explanation to the Intervenor on the same day, and D sent an e-mail to the same effect that the Intervenor would request more specific and clear explanation on the reason, and that it would be difficult to understand that it would be difficult to create a new provision on the freedom of personal discrimination from around May 16, 2014 to the Korean nationals, and thus, it would be difficult to understand that it would be difficult to raise any discrimination in the first instance.