If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On September 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B (the South and the 19 years old at that time) of the subway station No. 4 adjacent to the subway station located in Busan East-gu, Busan-gu, stating that “A mobile phone opening may not be made in the name of the victim B (the 19 years old at that time) who is a post-high school, with the bad credit standing, open a mobile phone and pay the mobile phone fees only for six months if he/she borrowed the four names.”

However, even if the defendant opens and uses a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the fee normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, let the victim open three mobile phones (C, D, and E) in the name of the victim from the mobile phone sales store near the subway station on the same day, and thereafter, had the victim acquire property benefits equivalent to the same amount because he/she did not pay the price even though he/she used 2,251,120 won in total from December 10, 2017.

2. On December 2018, 2018, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F, who was a middle school alumni, a middle school, to the Kakaox, “If the victim is unable to open a cell phone in the name of this city, if the cell phone is created in the name of this city, the cell phone fee will be paid without the inside.”

However, even if the defendant opens and uses a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the fee normally.

Nevertheless, on December 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) let the victim open one mobile phone (G) in the name of the victim from a mobile phone sales store located in Busan Dongdong-dong, Busan; and (c) from then to March 2019, the Defendant used the aforementioned mobile phone charges of KRW 1,99,540 and did not pay the same amount.