However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

1. The Defendant: (a) around 00:45 June 5, 2016, at around 00:5, the Defendant: (b) provided 157 Gangwon-gu, Seoul, 53 Gao-dong, Seoul, No. 53 Gao-dong, No. 157-ro, Gao-dong, No. 112, and called on the site after receiving a report on the 112 report; (c) requested police officers D and E to produce identification cards; (d) “Dhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhs

I would have to say that the frienda would have been forced if the frienda had the criend urology.

In doing so, “A police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes, public peace and maintenance of order by assaulting, plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. of the above D’s hard selling by hand, which interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes, public peace and order.

2. Defendant B: at the above temporary location, the defect that the above E attempted to arrest Defendant B as a current offender; and whether Defendant B “I am the same in our birth in the camping fris.”

C Mada, bitch bitch, bitch, bitch, will be discarded.

Mashee Mascars Scars police officers.

In doing so, “Absing the said E with his hand, assaulted by cutting off the arms, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes, public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs urology A with dyecology;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: each of the Defendants is subject to imprisonment with prison labor under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and each of the Defendants

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances are considered favorable for sentencing)

1. Defendants of a community service order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing] shall interfere with the performance of public duties;

2. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment; and