2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff: since the defendant paid only 119,769,400 won out of the price of the above goods, it is obligated to pay 30,228,108 won and damages for delay.

B. The Defendant: (a) the price of the above goods is related to a household supplied by the Plaintiff to the Busan Seogdong Apartment apartment site (hereinafter “slundong site”); (b) the Defendant entered into an agreement to settle accounts including the price of the remaining goods on March 7, 2014; and (c) even in the lawsuit brought against the Defendant by the Plaintiff’s wife C, the conciliation based on the above settlement agreement cannot be complied with; and (d) thus, the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be complied with.

3. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7 through 9 (including virtual numbers) as a whole, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the Defendant on September 20, 201 (hereinafter “instant contract”) to supply, install, and operate a household at the place of slun-dong (hereinafter “D”), ② On September 28, 201, after the conclusion of the instant contract, the Plaintiff established and operated a “stock Company D” (hereinafter “D”) and supplied goods equivalent to KRW 149,97,810 as stated in the said tax invoice to May 201 at the place of slun-dong (including virtual numbers). ③ The Plaintiff actually discontinued D around the end of March, 2014; and ④ the Plaintiff’s business operator registered with the Plaintiff as his/her representative, who actually traded the Plaintiff’s facilities under his/her name as his/her own name, and ④ the Plaintiff’s business operator registered with the Plaintiff.