beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.07 2015누33549

위법확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The following facts are recognized if basic facts are added to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, and Eul evidence No. 1.

A. On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a civil petition stating that “The Board of Audit and Inspection shall be responsible for the illegal cases of the Board of Audit and Inspection attached to one’s blogs” (hereinafter “instant civil petition”). On March 4, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted a civil petition containing the following (hereinafter “instant civil petition”).

On February 13, 2014, I do not reply to the civil petition which was filed and submit again.

On December 29, 2013, if there is an objection to the case of Blolobs, the civil petition requesting the presentation of evidence was concluded on January 14, 2014, and the case of Blobs is judged to have no objection to the case, and it is understood that Clobs directly produce the Blobs and appeal to the people.

The case attached to Blolobs is an administrative case of each ministry (including the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea's violation of Article 15 of the Civil Petitions Treatment Act), so it is necessary to take a lawful administrative measure, to have the person responsible for the execution of illegal administration, and to have the person responsible for the illegal administration, and to strictly cope with the illegal (such as a compromise) of the people after the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea's illegal act from the illegal to the people.

B. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) as of March 7, 2014, written thickness to the Plaintiff.

3.18.18.

3.19.

4. 2. The Board of Audit and Inspection of the Board of Audit and Inspection shall carry the civil petition. The civil petition shall be audited by the inspection of the dog and the civil petition for the delivery of a thickness shall be referred to in the future audit.

The answer was made with the content of "..........."

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendant is obligated to notify the Plaintiff of the treatment results of the instant civil petition pursuant to Article 15 of the Civil Petitions Treatment Act, but fails to reply to the Plaintiff’s civil petition by failing to reply to specific treatment results.