A. misunderstanding the legal principles, the Defendant merely posted the same article as the stated in the judgment of the court below in order to prevent damage to good students due to an exaggerated advertisement of the victimized person, which is for the public interest, so the illegality is dismissed by Article 310 of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of misunderstanding of the legal doctrine, the article posted by the Defendant not only pertains to the victim’s school punishment but also to the victim’s “s face unfolded and set off. However, now, the chin shape changed due to the fluor of money and Bosia.

I will be called as D in the New Village C.

It is necessary to see the fact that the 100estest 10s or more of the Amama 100s or more of the 100s or more of the desire for the f00th class of school punishment “The 600th class instructors have the public book, have the f.m. books, have the f.m.s., the f.s., the f.s., the f.r.s., the f.s. and the f.s.,

It also refers to the appearance, class method, etc. of the victim such as ‘'.

Considering the subject of timely facts, specific contents, method of expression, and the degree of infringement of reputation of other persons who may be damaged or damaged by expression, it is difficult to view that the writing posted by the Defendant against the victim solely indicates true facts for the public interest constitutes grounds for excluding illegality under Article 310 of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. In the instant case where there is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing that would be specifically considered in the appellate court’s determination on the unfair argument of sentencing, the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, health conditions, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and circumstances such as the content of the Defendant’s above notice and the fact that the victim did not agree with the victim.