성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (unfair sentencing) is as follows: (a) the instant crime was committed in the name of “C” from November 7, 2016 to November 8, 2016, with the shower room equipped by the Defendant; and (b) five partitions and four partitions installed with a simple be installed; (c) it is not good that the crime is committed to arrange to have sexual intercourse with female employees for business purposes in return for payment from the visitors visiting the said place; and (d) the Defendant has history of being punished by a fine for the same kind of crime; (b) in light of the fact that the lower court’s sentence imposing a fine of KRW 5 million is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized the mistake of the Defendant; (b) the benefits acquired by the instant crime were not much high; and (c) the conditions for all the sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background of the commission of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., even if considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable; and (d) the
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.