협박등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant sent to the Defendant’s wife a word that the Defendant was pregnant with another male’s her baby, and sent to the Defendant a word that the Defendant was pregnant with another male’s her baby, and the Defendant started dispute with the victim. The Defendant sent to the Defendant a word that he was pregnant with the Defendant’s her baby, accompanied by an embryotopy photo.
1. Intimidation;
A. On August 3, 2015, the Defendant sent the victim’s word “on the face of Dold, it shall be placed on the Korean website” to the victim, and “dial and audio files with D (the victim’s seat) in C&B.”
Along with the letter "hyn", a photograph and a honda" shall be called "B-friendly."
The thickness of sending the Kakao Stockholm conversation with the content of “a Kakao Kakao Kakao Kakao Kakao,” which read “a Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ma
H. Dispatching words "hump" with the words "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", "hump", means
The victim threatened the victim.
B. On November 11, 2015, the Defendant sent to the victim a letter "on the 15:34th day of November 2015, 2015, the Defendant sent to the victim the word "on the flacing screen flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing flacing fla
The victim threatened the victim.
(c)
On December 3, 2015, at around 20:46, there is an idea that the Defendant would operate a coffee shop before he/she reaches the top day of the victim, and that he/she would operate a coffee shop.
On the other hand, the issue is that “the data of Italian sales,” which is the internal document of the Plaintiff called the victim, was transmitted to the Defendant, and it is also a photograph after capturing the above data, along with “the king Group Audit Office,” which is the inside document of the Plaintiff.