However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, around 02:50 on June 23, 2014, entered the Cheongju-si Police Station D District of the Police Station equivalent to the Cheongju-gu Office C on the ground that the Defendant wraps tobacco in the taxi, and entered the said Zone while doing a dispute with FF of the E-si on the ground that the Defendant wraped tobacco in the taxi, etc., the Defendant, while entering the said Zone, who was a police officer belonging to the said Zone, while entering the Zone G, wn the Defendant having the tobacco smoking into the Zone, shall not avoid smoking in the Office.

“The Defendant imposed a penalty for light crime on the ground that the Defendant laid tobacco out of the defective global belt, and that the said G arbitrarily laid the tobacco at any place, and the Defendant imposed a penalty for light crime on the Defendant. The Defendant H of the police officer G and police officers belonging to the same global belt as the above police officer G, “Wing away from the scar in order to stop away from the scar in order to stop.”

Republic of Korea N.N. N.N.

Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz., Doz., depending on the inside of the house.

“Along on about 1 hour and 30 minutes, such as sound, the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by threatening the above police officers with regard to the duties of the district guard, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (one right to record evidence and eight pages);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) (i.e., interference with the performance of official duties) [Special mitigated Persons] [Pronouncement Decision] in light of the circumstances of the instant crime and the contents of intimidation, the Defendant shall be held liable for the same kind of punishment for one year sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year due to the crime of bodily injury in the past 2012.

However, the defendant is guilty of committing the crime in this court.