When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a driver of a passenger car at the highest level.

On August 31, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on August 21, 201:25, and proceeded at a speed of about 50km per hour at a speed of 50km, depending on the speed from the direction of “D” in front of “D” at the time of a showing to drive the said vehicle at a speed of C, to the eropoching of a cell.

There are a central line, and there are frequent traffic of vehicles, so there was a duty of care to refrain from proceeding beyond the central line in the opposite direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle for the passenger of the victim E (35 years old, South) who was proceeding normally in the opposite part due to the negligence going beyond the median line, and led to the shock of the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Thus, the above victims E suffered injuries that need to be treated for about 2 weeks, such as the salt pansium and tension of the shoulder, the salt pansium and tension, and the tension with the head of the damaged vehicle, and suffered injuries that need to be treated for about 2 weeks, such as the salt pansty and tension of the erosty and the tension of the eros.g., the erosium and the tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report, photographs, and medical certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.