손해배상(건)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, except for the case where the plaintiff’s assertion is determined additionally, and therefore, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant promised to make up for the date of occupancy in the above canal wells advertisement, specifying the scheduled date of occupancy, but the above construction still has not been completed even after the lapse of the contract.
According to the evidence evidence Nos. 18 and 20, it is difficult to recognize that the scheduled occupancy date was indicated on September 2018 in relation to the above canal wells in F Blogs or mass media advertisements, but the facts and evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the defendant promised to specify the scheduled occupancy date of the above canal wells to the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Rather, all the circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned facts and the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 2, 6 through 9, 16 through 29, and 33 are considered as a whole. In particular, the term "the scheduled occupancy date" as mentioned above is merely that the defendant, not the defendant, voluntarily stated for the convenience of the public relations of sale, and the advertising phrase in other tables than the above advertising phrase is written that the occupancy is commenced in the second half of October 2018 or in the second half of 2018. If the plaintiff intended to include the scheduled occupancy date in the contract of this case as the contents of the contract of this case as alleged in the plaintiff, it is general to specify the scheduled occupancy date or the scheduled occupancy date in the contract of this case. However, the defendant is required to notify the plaintiff one month prior to the designated occupancy date, but the business is delayed due to the reasons not attributable to the defendant, such as modification of the permitted matters and civil petition.