When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall borrow or lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive any consideration in using or managing access medium used in electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on April 2017, the Defendant would pay KRW 3 million to the account at the time of lending the account from a person who was in the name of a senior policeman.

“The proposal received and consented, and thereafter, the door-to-door news article sent by the winners of the name in front of the Buddhist office located in the Madong-si-si-dong-si-dong-dong-si, was opened with the head of the Tong and the check card connected with the Defendant’s new cooperation account (B).

Accordingly, the Defendant lent an access medium while receiving, demanding, or promising compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching materials for response to correspondence with delegations);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to verify transaction details;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;