beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.17 2015고단174

업무상횡령

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the director of social welfare facilities affiliated with victim D, managed and supervised the overall affairs of E, and was engaged in overall affairs of management and execution of project costs of E.

1. Around September 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had had a friendly relationship with others for the use of financing for the expenses for the operation of the restaurant at the Doctrine Welfare Center; and (b) had been arbitrarily used for the purchase of 320,000 won among the expenses for the operation of the restaurant at the Doctrine-gun F; and (c) had been in custody for the purchase of Doctrine lines by Doctrine.

2. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant had paid KRW 570,00 with the E corporate card and received it in cash, and used it arbitrarily as employees meal expenses, repair expenses of disabled aids, etc. during the process of paying KRW 570,000 for the purpose of using it as repair expenses for disabled persons, etc.

3. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) had a view to using a cafeteria operating project cost for the disabled’s public welfare hall to lend a gift to those who had a friendly relationship; and (b) had a view to using KRW 320,00 of the cafeteria operating project cost, which was kept in the “G” as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1), arbitrarily used 320,000, out of the cafeteria operating project cost.

4. On September 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had the intention to lend the E operating expenses by using a 'line-based' method; and (b) had not purchased an amount equivalent to KRW 150,000 in cleaning tools as the E operating expenses; and (c) had paid KRW 150,000 with the E corporate card and used it arbitrarily for personal expenditure after having settled the settlement of KRW 150,000 with the E corporate card, in cash, for the purpose of preserving the gift expenses of related agencies in 2013, which were individually disbursed.

5. The Defendant, on September 30, 2013, on the same grounds as the foregoing paragraph 4.