Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent to defraud in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.