A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million and by a fine of KRW 7 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person operating the “F car center” in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and Defendant B is the owner of GWz car, and the fact was that Defendant A was a driver of the said car center of the said car center, and the accident occurred due to the driver’s negligence while driving the cryp car requested repair by another customer. However, Defendant A conspired to claim insurance money as if Defendant A’s H cyp car was shocked.

around January 13, 2016, the Defendants: (a) at the above car center; (b) around January 6, 2016, Defendant A moved back from H Racs Hacs on January 6, 2016; and (c) at around 06:10, Defendant B, who was parked in the above car center, was damaged by the bitz car owned by Defendant B.

“To the effect that “the victim Samsung T&T Co., Ltd. received an accident report from the victim, by deceiving the victim, and the victim was paid KRW 13,062,00 from the victim on February 5, 2016 for the repair cost of the vehicle, etc.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to obtain pecuniary benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. An investigation intelligence report, a report on the commencement of internal investigation, a request for cooperation in investigation into insurance crimes, a request for investigation, a receipt of an accident, a contract list, a motor vehicle insurance claim, a statement of payment of insurance proceeds, fact confirmation, automobile registration ledger, repair specifications, statement of claims, each photograph, telephone conversations details, each of the items of payment of insurance proceeds, and a traffic accident comprehensive analysis, Defendant A is the time-matter of the facts charged of this case. Defendant B, who was guilty, said that Defendant A was involved in an accident following his rasp spts and caused the accident to the rasp spts and dealt with the insurance covered by the rasp.

Defendant A, who became aware of that reduction, received a cargo-lane passenger car.

The purport is that there is no doubt.