2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime in the trial, and that the health status is not good.

However, considering the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, the amount of damage was high, the victim was unable to recover from damage even after a long time has passed from the time of committing the crime, the victim also sought the punishment of the defendant, the sentence against the defendant seems to have been determined by fully taking into account the various circumstances as seen earlier, and there is no change of circumstances that may vary between the court below and the punishment at the time of the trial, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and records of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after committing the crime, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable since the sentence imposed by the court below is too too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.