A Imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 4 months, Defendant C, D, and E by a fine of 2,00,000.

[Status of Defendant A] The head of the Seoul District Branch of the Democratic Labor Union G branch of the Seoul District Office of the Democratic Labor Union, Defendant B is the head of the site of the said branch, Defendant C, D, and E are the members of the said branch.

【Criminal Facts】

The victim H Co., Ltd. was the commencement works for tourist hotel construction works outside the Jung-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, and three lots of land. As such, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the said Defendants to pay the above Defendants the amount of money in the name of the construction cost, using the construction equipment, such as the construction equipment owned by the Defendants C, D, and E, if the said Defendants were to assist the said public works, using the construction equipment.

Defendant C, D, and E, from August 31, 2013 to October 30 of the same year, pursuant to the above terms and conditions of the contract, from around August 31, 2013, Defendant C, and C, D, and E were unable to receive the rent agreed upon from (ju) the construction of a tourist hotel on three lots outside the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon, by using their construction equipment, and then, the said Defendants conspired to collect the rent directly from the victim by intrusioning upon the members of the G branch of the Democratic Labor Union G branch of the Korean National Construction Workers' Union into the original state I and making the organization.

1. Joint criminal conduct of Defendant A, C, D, and E;

A. According to the above public offering in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion), the Defendants came to the office of the (ju) International Office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office 402 on December 3, 2013, around 09:0, and the Defendants demanded the employees of the company to visit the said office through the entrance despite the restriction of L et al., a member of the National Construction Workers' Union G branch of the company, with the members of the company at the entrance, and let the employees of the company visit the said office. Accordingly, L requested the Defendants to leave the office.