특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person engaging in driving a PP car.
On June 1, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on the 12:36th day of 2017, while driving the car and driving the Da Mart in front of the D Mart in Samsung-si along the two-lanes of the French New Housing Site from the direction of the ethm.m. to the 2-lane of the French Housing Site.
Since such a place is an intersection where the two-lanes of a narrow runway road and a narrow runway are in contact, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has entered the intersection first by reducing or temporarily stopping the speed, and to check whether there is a vehicle, etc. being driven by entering the intersection and drive it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the front part of the victim E(48) driving car entering the above intersection from the right side of the proceeding direction to the left side by the negligence, which led to the Defendant’s failure to do so.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the said victim E by occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of light base and tensions, caused the injury to the victim G (e.g., 54 years old) boarding the said victim’s frighting car to undergo approximately three-day medical treatment, and inflicted the injury such as frighting frighting, etc. to the said victim H (e.g., 74 years old), caused the injury to the said victim’s Ha (e.g., 74 years old), which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and did not immediately stop to the said victim I (e., 74 years old) for about two weeks of medical treatment; the victim’s J (e.g., 62 years old) who was boarding the said frighting car to undergo approximately two-day medical treatment; the victim’s frighting ties and tensions requiring medical treatment; and at the same time, the victim’s frighting car was damaged to the said victim’s frighting car without immediately stoppinging it.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;
1. E, J.