2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On September 1, 1984, the Plaintiff was appointed as a civilian military employee and served as a member of the coal arrangement cost of the Army B Am2 Bm2 Bm2, and was injured by the Plaintiff. On July 20, 2010, around 10:40, the Plaintiff was on the job of moving approximately 54 km with the other civilian military employees at the above workplace of Bm2, but was on the job of moving approximately 155 m2 to Bm2, with the other civilian military employees at the workplace of Bm2.

The Plaintiff was diagnosed of the post-sign escape certificate No. 2-3, No. 3-4, and No. 4-5 on July 22, 2010, and vertebrate No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”). On July 27, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of the vertebrate No. 1, No. 5-3, and was diagnosed of the vertebrate No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).

B. On September 20, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for approval of medical care for the instant injury and disease on official duty with the Public Official Pension Service (hereinafter “Public Official Pension Service”). However, on October 14, 2010, the Corporation did not obtain external shocks, etc. from the date of the instant injury and disease on October 14, 2010, and most of the reasons for the instant injury and disease are changes in their happiness, and as a result of the self-official filming examination, multiple scamscopics are observed on the part of the Huuri-ri as the result of the self-official filming examination, the instant injury and disease were not approved on the ground that proximate causal relation with the official duties is not recognized.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a revocation suit against the Corporation as Seoul Administrative Court 201Gudan1757, and was sentenced to a dismissal ruling on February 2, 2012, but the Seoul High Court 2012Nu5789, revoked the first instance judgment and received a judgment citing the claim, and the Corporation appealed as Supreme Court 2012Du23921 but was dismissed by the Supreme Court.

C. Since then, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on June 30, 2014, and on July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Defendant, but the Defendant, on November 14, 2014, stated that there is no proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s performance of his/her duties, and accordingly, determined that the instant injury and disease was ineligible for distinguished services to the State and for veteran’