2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On September 2019, the Defendant, at the art room of the Defendant’s operation located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, in Gangnam-gu Seoul on September 2019, set up a number plate by means of indicating the number of the vehicle in the paper, the same size as the front vehicle number plate, and attached it to the front driver number plate of the said van, for the purpose of exercising the difficulty in vehicle operation by keeping the number plate of the vehicle in custody as a fine for negligence unpaid.

On September 2019, the Defendant continued to drive the said van without attaching a number plate created by the Defendant at his own discretion from approximately 500 meters to G church located in the same Gu F from the Young-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si to the G church located in the same Gu.

For the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged the registration number plate, which is the mark of public office, and exercised the registration number plate, which is the mark of the forged public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning national newspaper, vehicle photograph image, internal report (C vehicle register attached);

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is that the defendant has forged the number plate of a vehicle, which is air defense, and exercised it on the vehicle, and thus his responsibility is not weak. However, the defendant's attitude to recognize and reflect his/her criminal act is not the criminal act committed for profit, but the criminal act was not committed for profit, the defendant has not been punished for the same crime, and other conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively considered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.