교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On September 27, 2017, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Jeju District Court on September 27, 201, and a person who received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the same court on November 30, 2010.
1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a car with the territory of the B Bara.
On December 23, 2017, around 14:45, the Defendant driven the said car with alcohol content of 0.086% at an open apartment parking lot located in Heung-gu Sungdong-ro 359, Cheongju-ro, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-ro, with alcohol content of 0.086% in blood, and continued to proceed to the said apartment toward 104 east from the entrance of the underground parking lot.
There are lots of apartment underground parking lots, and at the time, Dunching car driven by the victim C(31) was in the front section and was in the state of finding and stopping the Defendant’s vehicle. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the front section and the steering and steering system.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeds constantly, and received the part of the damaged vehicle back to the left side of the vehicle driving by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as scopical salt, which requires treatment for up to three days.
2. Around 14:45 on December 23, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-Satop car while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.086% in a section of approximately 200 meters away from a 13-lane-ro 359-ro, Jung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju-ro.
As a result, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving again.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against C;
1. A traffic accident;