However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, in turn, conspired with the victims to receive damages directly from the victims and to have five percent of the amount of damages from the victims under the direction of the victim, which is the general responsibility of the organization of the crime of telephone financing fraud (the term " Bosing"; hereinafter the term " Bosing"), in order to verify whether the amount deposited in the pertinent account is criminal proceeds, by misrepresenting the public prosecutor, the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and by opening a passbook under the victim's name. The Defendant conspired to perform the role of withdrawing cash and delivering the remaining amount of damages in compliance with the direction given by the above persons.

On January 31, 2018, an employee whose name was not known to serve as a counselor for the telephone service of the host organization, said employee made a false statement to the Financial Supervisory Service, “The head of the Tong under the name of the party was used in the public prosecutor’s office, and there was a need to confirm whether the victim is a victim or a perpetrator,” by phoneing to the victim C without the prosecutor’s intent to verify whether the victim’s money was a criminal proceeds.” As such, the employee made a false statement to the effect that “the head of the Tong under the name of the party was used in the public prosecutor’s office, and the victim was a victim or a perpetrator.

The telephone counselor of the above Bosing Organization shall deception the victim and have the victim withdraw 6 million won from the new bank, and the defendant assumes the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service at the new bank near Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, around 13:30 of the same day and received six million won from the injured person.

As a result, the Defendant was informed of the victim by deceiving the victim in collusion with the above-mentioned general responsibility, name-free telephone counselor, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;